Controversial EU Copyright Proposed Measure: Here Is What You Should Know

Members of the European Parliament are bartering thorns over a recommended bill that may have severe consequences on the internet in Europe. The update to the European Union Copyright Directive does many things, but the notable developments are regarding how data is shared as well as copyright infringement, specially recorded in Article 13 of the proposed bill.

The European Parliament defined the law as building “a new auxiliary right for news broadcasters, often called ‘the link tax,’ and it sets a common fresh responsibility on internet platforms and websites to observe the user content on their site for copyright violations.

This development has sent upheavals via the internet and has pitted substantial news publishers and media giants against internet behemoths such as Google and Wikipedia, which would go through the most suffering due to the new act.

Here are some points which businesses should keep in mind:

1- News Websites to get more Copyrights

The proposed law will need everybody before they publish links to news stories to take permission from news outlets. The brief bit and image which one sees when they share a news story on social media platforms such as Facebook or Twitter will now be deemed copyright violation.

Other nations such as Germany and Spain have attempted link taxes previously to no avail, and news publicists promptly acidulated on them too. The only nation which has managed it efficiently is China, where the Middle has greatly stricter restrictions on the news which gets published.

Julia Reda, the Member of the European Parliament, stated the proposition would be almost unlikely for certain websites to battle with and will put an unwanted weight on the wrong individuals.

It will be impractical as even quoting a headline from the cold war period would need permission from the primary publisher who may no longer be in business.

2- Copyright Infringement Checks

All of the internet platforms will have to browse all the user content and check for any possible copyright transgression. It has not been stated how the websites should perform this responsibility, and likely believe they must either create their own tool for scanning user content or hire third-party groups to do it for them, an expensive effort for any company.

Intellectual property professor Dr. Martin Senftlebens stated that this rule would lead to additional market density and limited information diversity. It will become way more challenging to get investors for coming start-up platforms, he said.

A few members of the European Parliament supported the scheme, asking why sites can scan for racist and offensive material yet still they cannot make allowances for copyrighted content.

3- Review Process

Websites will also be bound to form a review process to enable rightsholders to refresh this database of copyrighted content with the added copyrighted material. This process will be expensive for small websites and bestows a multitude of obstacles which have not yet been addressed by the European Parliament.

Cory Doctorow, a special advisor of Electronic Frontier Foundation, said that the law would fall apart as copyright infringement software is not adequately reliable. YouTube had created its own, and it is still endlessly criticized by media corporations for not being able to prevent more individuals from stealing material.

Source –

Comments are closed