Monolithic vs Microservice Architecture- Pros and Cons

What are Microservices?

Microservice architecture refers to the concept of developing one application as a set of small services, in contrast to developing them together, large ‘monolith’.

Each of these broken-up, individualized services run on their own process, communicating with lightweight mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. Fully-fledged microservices are independently deployable and yet can add tandem when necessary.

Monolithic vs Microservice Architecture- Pros and Cons

Microservices Pros:

Better Organization: Microservice architectures are typically better organized, since each microservice features a very specific job, and isn’t concerned with the roles of other components.

Decoupled: Decoupled services also are easier to recompose and reconfigure to serve the needs of various apps (for example, serving both the online clients and public API). They also leave fast, independent delivery of individual parts within a bigger, integrated system.

Performance: Under guided the proper circumstances, microservices also can have performance advantages counting on how they’re organized because it’s possible to isolate hot services and scale them independent of the remainder of the app.

Fewer Mistakes: Microservices enable to access the parallel development by establishing a hard-to-cross boundary between different parts of your system. By doing this, you create it hard – or a minimum of harder – to try to to the incorrect thing: Namely, connecting parts that shouldn’t be connected, and coupling too tightly people who got to be connected.

Microservices Cons:

Cross-cutting Concerns Across Each Service: As you’re building a replacement microservice architecture, you’re likely to get many cross-cutting concerns that you simply didn’t anticipate at design time. You’ll either got to incur the overhead of separate modules for every cross-cutting concern (i.e. testing) or encapsulate cross-cutting concerns in another service layer that each one traffic gets routed through. Eventually, even monolithic architectures tend to route traffic through an outer service layer for cross-cutting concerns, but with a monolithic architecture, it’s possible to delay the value of that employment until the project is far more mature.

Higher Operational Overhead: Microservices are frequently deployed on their own virtual machines or containers, causing a proliferation of VM wrangling work. These tasks are frequently automated with container fleet management tools.

What is a Monolith?

A monolithic application is made as one , unified unit. Often a monolith consists of three parts: a database , a client-side interface (consisting of HTML pages and/or JavaScript running during a browser), and a server-side application. The server-side application will handle HTTP requests, execute domain-specific logic, retrieve and update data from the database, and populate the HTML views to be sent to the browser.

Another characteristic of a monolith is that it’s often one massive code base. Server side application logic, front client side logic, background jobs, etc, are all defined within the same code base. this suggests if developers want to form any changes or updates, they have to create and deploy the whole stack all directly .

Monolith Pros:

Fewer Cross-cutting Concerns: a serious advantage related to monolithic architecture is that you simply only got to worry about cross-cutting concerns, like logging or caching, for one application.

Less Operational Overhead: Focusing your finances on one application means there’s just one application that you simply got to found out logging, monitoring and testing for. A Monolith is additionally generally less complex to deploy since you aren’t organizing multiple deployments.

Easier Testing: With a monolith, automated tests are easier to setup and run because, once more , everything is under an equivalent roof. With microservices, tests will got to accommodate for various applications on different runtime environments — which may get complex.

Performance: A monolith also can boast performance advantages as compared to microservices. That’s often right down to a monolith using local calls rather than an API call across a network.

Monolith Cons:

Overly-tight Coupling: While monoliths can assist you avoid entanglement as previously mentioned, a monolith becomes more susceptible to entanglement the larger it grows. Because everything is so tightly coupled, isolation of services within the monolith becomes arduous, making life difficult when it involves independent scaling or code maintenance.

Harder To Understand: It’s common to seek out that monoliths are harder beasts to know as compared to microservices, a drag which rears its head when on-boarding new team members.

For More Info About Microservices Online Training Click Here

Ph No: +91- 9989971070, E-Mail ID:

Comments are closed